When the new 4k 144hz HDR monitors come out next year, with the accompanying upgraded GPU's, that will be the next level for sure. The 1080ti seems to be running everything pretty well too, I am getting 80fps in Battlefield 1 on Ultra, and respectable in other games as well, plus G sync.Īs a side note, SLI is almost useless, has not provided many gains even at 4K for most games, so that's disappointing. 60hz really isn't bad at all, in fact you only really notice it in fast moving FPS games, everything else is fairly fine. Of course, the only drawback is 60hz vs 100 or 144hz. You can definitely tell the difference vs 1440p, and 3440x1440 as well after you're used to it. I must say, 4K gaming is where ultimately it's at. game over pixel display, video computer text illustration, and discover more than 24 Million Professional Graphic Resources on Freepik. I have also tested the Acer Predator 4k monitor with G sync, with a 1080 ti Strix OC card. Download this Premium Vector about Game over fantastic computer background with glitch noise retro effect vector screen. The widescreen definitely makes it for a very nice gaming experience, even though it's a pretty physically large monitor. I personally do alot of gaming, and am currently saving for the Acer x34 or Asus PG348Q, but I know tons of people who absolutely love their multi-monitor setups.In the past I moved from the 1440p 27 inch Asus/G sync panel, which was great - into the Acer X34 3440x1440. Of course there are exceptions to this statement, but generally that's how it is. If you primarily do gaming, then the ultrawide is better. If you primarily do work, then 3x is better. Less multitasking and less on-screen workspaceĪssuming you go the 3440x1440 route, higher pixel density means your mouse will move slower (unless you buy a higher DPI mouse) and your on screen text will often be drawn smaller.īasically what it comes down to is your specific needs. While it has gotten better in recent years (especially in games), you're still going to run into alot of side bars/sizing/scaling issues. Typically is more aesthetically pleasing than 3x (but again, this is subjective)Īssuming you go the 3440x1440 route you get sharper images, especially in games.Ģ1:9 is less universally comparable with computers. (Arguably) provides a much more immersive experience when gaming due to curved panel Often feels less immersive when gaming due to Higher pixel count results in more work for your computer to handle (especially whilst gaming) Typically doesn't look as clean (cable management, misaligned monitors, etc. Greater field of view in games (assuming you use all 3 monitors) You can still game on only one monitor if you discover a game doesn't have good triple monitor support or you computer cant handle it MUCH more on-screen workspace (48:9 vs 21:9) Legit keys are needed of course :) This is the best method. The 2 apk installation dont interfere each other so you can have both apks. and delete the ei.cfg file in soucres folder, burn them both and you have 2 original disks that can install any version you need. Photo: Advanced -> final JPG - 100 Enhanced HDR+ - yes Remove zoom - yes save to DCIM - yes alternative config - yes OIS - yes. Advanced -> FIX -> RAW format - Sensor Viewfinder format - YUV. Most computer content is designed for 16:9 Advanced -> Base -> Pixel2018 need YUV back&front - Pixel 3XL. This will be a quick list and not cover everything, but at least it should help point you in the right direction when making this decision Heres a rough list of pros and cons to 3x monitor vs ultrawide. then even when you want to game, you can use one of the monitors for proper gaming, or even all 3 of em if you don't mind the bars in the middle of your screen (which I personally hate). If you're doing alot of work, triple monitor is the way to go (for all the reasons listed above). Ultrawide vs 3x 1080p is largely about what you want and need.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |